Skip to content

FAQ

Not yet. The AEV and BND tokens are specified but not issued. A SAFT round is planned for M3; public distribution follows mainnet at M7.

Why ML-DSA-65 rather than Falcon or SPHINCS+?

Section titled “Why ML-DSA-65 rather than Falcon or SPHINCS+?”

ML-DSA is NIST FIPS 204 (ratified August 2024), offers balanced signature / key sizes for on-chain use, and has a mature reference implementation on embedded targets. Falcon is more compact but floating-point hazards complicate constant-time implementations; SPHINCS+ signatures are too large for routine on-chain use.

Layer-2 inherits the finality and censorship profile of its layer-1. Separating value and computation onto two independent ledgers lets each optimise for its constraint without one dominating the other.

First commits land with M1 (public at codeberg.org/aevum-bond, mirrored to GitHub). The specification corpus is available on request until the repository goes fully public.

Currently self-funded. An NLnet NGI0 Core grant application is in flight (scoped to Arca). Pre-seed (USD 1.5 M), Seed (USD 4.5 M), and SAFT (USD 5.5 M) rounds are planned across M2–M3.